Navigating the Pros and Cons of Overseas Property Investment as an Expat

10th November 2023
In my role as a financial advisor catering to expats worldwide, I engage in countless conversations about investment property. It's no surprise that owning rental property is a preferred choice among expats with capital to allocate.

While property can undoubtedly be a valuable addition to a diversified portfolio, it's equally important to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of direct property ownership compared to other investment options.
Owning property as an expat overseas can be a complex endeavor, with some jurisdictions imposing restrictions on foreign property ownership. These complications often translate into additional costs and inconveniences, which can erode returns and create challenges for property owners.

Personally, I hold reservations about property investment even in cases where direct ownership is feasible. Property is unique in that it can be sold without the seller's obligation to discuss its risks with the buyer. This stands in stark contrast to other investments where such disclosures are mandatory. Across the world, where there are expats, there are property companies, often cheerleaders for the asset class but frequently dismissive of the risks and factors that can diminish returns.

These factors include the exorbitant transaction costs associated with property, which typically far exceed those of other asset classes, taxes on rental income, ongoing maintenance expenses, potential periods of rental vacancies, legal fees for addressing tenant-related issues, and numerous other considerations.
Furthermore, property investments are highly illiquid. There's no guarantee that you can sell a property at your preferred time for its full market value. Therefore, investing directly in property isn't as foolproof as it may appear from the sales pitches of property agents.

However, it's essential to acknowledge that property investments can yield favorable returns when factoring in rental income alongside capital appreciation. Thus, there is a valid case for incorporating property into a well-diversified asset portfolio as a means to limit exposure and mitigate the aforementioned challenges.

Additionally, there's a considerable gap between the perceived risk associated with property and its actual risk profile in the broader financial landscape. Property, while moderately high in risk, is often perceived as low-risk or even risk-free by less scrupulous sales agents.

Many expats who have resided overseas for an extended period may accumulate multiple properties, often concentrated within a single jurisdiction or even a small geographic area within that jurisdiction. This concentration represents an exceptionally high-risk strategy—one that no financial professional would recommend. Yet, many expats may be blissfully unaware of the level of risk they are assuming.

At Brigantia Private Wealth Management, we incorporate property into client portfolios where it is relevant from a risk perspective. We do so within the framework of a thoroughly diversified portfolio, enabling us to mitigate the risks and challenges associated with property investments. Additionally, we have access to specialised commercial property opportunities when they align with a client's financial goals.

In conclusion, it's crucial to maintain a balanced perspective and carefully consider the pros and cons of property investments before committing significant capital. While property can play a valuable role in your investment strategy, it should be approached with a clear understanding of the associated risks and a well-thought-out plan to manage them effectively.